People of Russia

Starodub – specific princes, his name got from the main town in their inheritance, Starodub, Vladimir, and Starodub-on-Klyazma (not Starodub-scale enterprises, as mistaken by some researchers), now the village Klyazemsky town of Vladimir province, 12 miles from Kovrov. In the XV and XVI centuries. He called it Starodub-Votskim, then Starodub-Ryapolovskim. About the time of occurrence of this city no information has survived, in various indirect indications to think that it was founded by Yuri Dolgoruky. First mentioned in chronicles in 1218 under In the era of the Tatar invasion Starodub was already quite prominent city and belonged to the Grand Duchesses. Vladimirsky. Centre is the inheritance of his name he was soon after the departure of Batu from the north-eastern Russia. Grand Prince Yaroslav Vsevolodovich, appearing in the left Tatars Vladimir, had to use considerable effort to reestablish some order in the capital itself, and throughout the principality, devastated and robbed Asians; at the same time he has taken care of and his two younger brothers, – Svyatoslav and Ivan Vsevolodovich: the first gave unto Suzdal, and the second – Starodub. That was in 1238 with some of these pores and begins the existence Starodubsky inheritance with independent princes, leading, thus, its origin from the youngest, is the eighth son of Grand Duke Vladimir Vsevolod the Big Nest, Ivan Vsevolod (from Rurik knee X). Starodub inheritance existed for relatively short periods: from the selected area is large. Prince. Vladimir in 1238, he was about in 1360 was denied by Moscow almost all independence, and then about half of XV century, it was also completely absorbed and degraded to the level of the ordinary, besides impoverished province. But never, even in the early days of existence, when used more and independence, and autonomy, a prominent role of this lot have not played, and could not play – was too insignificant for that of its territory. Accordingly, no larger meaning or impact on current events could not have, of course, and his princes. They were forced to be content with a modest position, the role of a secondary or auxiliary. Rod actually princes Starodub, whose representatives are sitting at the main table inheritance, sometimes called the Grand Dukes (of course, unlike the younger princes of the sidelines) – should be deemed as terminated with the abolition of the inheritance. However, the princes of Starodub generally in the chronicles and other primary sources continue to meet and then, they need to understand is not as princes of the unit, as well as carrier-established tradition of names for them. Hardly any of the other princes of the unit so much multiplied and have given so much side-lines, as a kind of book. Starodub, While his elder representative of one after the other occupied table Starodub, others received less inheritances, isolated from the main area, followed by stronger, more often, depending on the name of the main parish in their inheritance, new nicknames, and thus they became progenitors of new princely families, most of whom subsequently achieved considerable influence. In XV knee (from Rurik) separated from the birth of princes Starodubye Pozharskys (extinct in 1685), Ryapolovskih (in turn in the seventeenth knee gave away the book kind. Strigino, and in count XVII. Dividing the two branches: the elder – the book. Khilkov and younger – the book. Tatevs) and Paletskiy, in the next lap (XVI) branched into the book. Tulupova and Prince. Motley, who XVII count. identified three lines – the senior, middle, and youngest – the book. Gundurovyh; in XVI count. Starodub received from the beginning of the book. Romodanovsky and Prince. Golibesovskie in the next knee branched into the book. Gagarin and the book. Nebogatov, finally, in count XVII. the main kind of book. Starodub gives up five new princely families: Krivoborskih, Lyalovskih, carpet, and Osipovsky Neuchkinyh. Most of these genera, sooner or later die out and so far survived a branch of the Princes Gagarin, Khilkov and Romodanovsky-Lodyzhenskii (female line; male line of Prince. Romodanovsky cut short in 1730). 1. Ivan Vsevolodovich, eighth and youngest son is great. Prince Vladimir and Suzdal, Vsevolod, nicknamed the Big Nest, the grandson of Yuri Dolgoruky, the first local Prince of Starodub was born August 28, 1197 or 1198 (for Hypation Chronicle. – August 1, 1197), "and there was joy, great in the city Volodimeri his birth, "says about this chronicler.About childhood years IV survived only a few news; by 1206, ie, when he was about 9 years old, he mentioned among other children led. book. Vsevolod, following it to the river Shedashki his elder brother Constantine sent his father to rule in Novgorod. Hostile Vsevolod Black Chernigov against the Grand Duke was forced last resort to the aid of Constantine, who was summoned from Novgorod to Vladimir and back on Feb. 28, 1207 on the same river Shedashke met him again, IV and his brothers Yuri and Vladimir. Participation IV in quarrels and feuds and princes in those days, so to speak, political life begins very early, which, however, for the prince of ancient Russia was a phenomenon common. In April 1212, when the IV was no more than 15 years old, his father died, Vsevolod, the eldest son of the latter, Constantine, was known to be devoid of a princely table, which is testament to the deceased went to his next (from the living ) son, Yuri Vsevolodovich. On the basis of succession between the two older brothers there was a fierce struggle, took part in it and the younger sons of Vsevolod, divided in their sympathies to the fighting: Svyatoslav III, Prince of St. George-Polish, supported Constantine IV the same, Yaroslav, Vladimir took the side of George, who headed a large ratification was not slow to approach to Rostov, where at this time ruled Constantine. In this campaign was involved, and IV Although the outside of the struggle, this time to end peacefully, but the latter could not be considered stable, and hostilities threaten to erupt, especially since the militant zeal to some extent been fueled suddenly changed group younger brothers around senior; IV is, however, not touched, and he remains loyal to Yuri. At the end of 1212 IV took a prominent and active role in new negotiations (at St. George's), ended with a mind-setting between the warring brothers, as if a lasting peace; but all of unreality to detect as early as next year when incessant strife again was taken to an open clash, as expressed in repeated hike Yuri Rostov. IV was one of the leaders of this campaign, during which suffered greatly from the vicinity of Rostov robbery. Opponents have met on the river Idshe (Vexin), but to join the battle is not resolved in a few days of fruitless standing against each other again began negotiations ended kiss the cross in the mutual love and friendship. There is reason to think that the JV later also participated in the famous battle of Lipetsk (1216), in which the Bold Mstislav defeated George. Although the name of the JV nowhere in the original sources are not explicitly mentioned, but the Resurrection Chronicle said that against Mstislav and his brother Constantine Jury out "with Sviatoslav and brethren", a plural last word should be understood Yaroslav and IV, so as there are still Vladimir was at this time on the side of Constantine. Then, in the course of more than 10 years after the battle, the name of JV is completely absent in the pages of the chronicles, even indirectly, is not mentioned, appearing only in 1226, when Yuri (the death of Constantine in 1218 over the Grand Duke Vladimir), security concerns eastern borders from attacks of the natives, sent him and Svyatoslav Mordovians. The campaign was successful, the brothers took a few villages, and returned home with victory and complete. " The next indication of the JV is located in the Laurentian Chronicle, where by 1227 he referred to is present at the restrictions provided in Mitrophan Vladimir bishops, after which the information about it is once again cut short by as much as
11 – 12 years, until 1238, when the Chronicle notes him among the princes, who escaped from the Tatar sword. In Tatishcheva is, however, an indication, it is unknown what is the basis, but on general grounds it is likely – that the IV took an active part in preparing large. Prince. Yuri resist the Tatars; shortly before the decisive battle with Russian Asians he was in Gorodets-Volga, which drove his wife and children, Grand Duke, and thence with a small force through the forests and jungles came to the rescue Yuri, who was standing on p. City, but came too late, when the fate of the battle is already decided. After death of Yuri, who fell in the bloodshed (4 March 1238), Vladimir went to his desk following his brother, Jaroslaw Vsevolodovich him the IV, and received the same year in the inheritance of the town of Starodub-Klyazemsky with parishes.From this fact and then it should be considered as prince of Starodub. As a final IV is mentioned only once, namely in 1245 when, together with Yaroslav and his children went to the Horde on the bow. His death was followed, probably in 1247, at least this is the last date on which it is mentioned at all, so he sat on the inheritance for 10 years, from 1238 to 1247 According to some pedigrees, had a nickname of porridge. The fruit of marriage IV with unknown was the only son of his, – 2. Mikhail Ivanovich, Prince of Starodub second share, from 1277 to 1281 Some family trees, for example. "Genealogy in the three lists," ed. Ever. Imp. Phys. commonly. history. and trees. Russia, according to his grandson, Ivan and his son Vsevolod, and not the father of Ivan Calistrat (see Next.), But the majority of primary sources (eg, Nikon Chronicle) and pedigrees Ivan Calistrat called patronymic Mihailovic, ie, consider the son of M . I., and he himself the son of Ivan Vsevolodovich that, apparently, more correctly. Due to this confusion and controversy is the primary sources, and behind them, and pedigrees on the year in the death of MI: Resurrection Chronicle, Velvet Book and?. ?. Spiridov in their research is to be made in 1315, while the Nikon chronicle indicates 1281, and adopted by almost all historians, as more probable, the very first date is considered the year of death of Ivan Calistrat. And apart from this confusion, the chronicles of life information about MI in general very poor. The first time he mentioned a 1277 in January, mourners carried. book. Basil Yaroslavich Mi (e) zinnogo (less) in Kostroma. Then mark another record of his participation in the internecine strife of brothers Dmitri and Andrei Aleksandrovich, the latest of which, contrary to custom, which gave the throne of the Grand oldest in kind, planned to take away Vladimir table with his elder brother, for that purpose in 1281 came up with the Tartars to Muromu and declared himself the Grand Duke, demanded that the princes to his unit. Among the princes followed his call was, and MI Apparently, he participated in the march Andrew Pereyaslavl, specific city Dmitry Alexandrovich in the campaign, earned the notorious reputation for brutality, devastation and looting, which betrayed the supporters of Andrew – the Tatars. It is possible that during this disgrace and died, MI 3. Ivan M., nicknamed Calistrat, the only son, the third prince Starodubsky inheritance, inherited from his father in 1281, year of birth unknown, died in all probability, in 1315 Chronicles the news about him almost completely absent, if not consider contradictory information about the date of his death and the place it occupies in the genealogy of princes Starodub, as above, with Mikhail Ivanovich. After the death of IM as he inherited his only son, – 4. Fyodor Ivanovich, who was called Blessed, the fourth Duke Starodub, who was sitting on his desk from 1315 to 1330, when he was killed in the Horde, just for this occasion he is mentioned in chronicles, it is a Nikon, which is limited to noting the fact and completely silent on the reasons for and the accompanying circumstances. A. Ekzemplyarsky suggests that the loss of the Horde, FI, like many other contemporary princes, has been accomplished "in the Duma, Ivan Kalita, who about that time began to press strongly princes, and bring many of them izvety Tatar khan. On the other hand, the epithet FI Blessed gives some reason to believe that he died for the faith. However, some people call it genealogies Neblagovernym that questioned the assumption just mentioned. He had three sons: Dmitri (5), Ivan (6) and Andrew (7). 5. Dmitri, the eldest son of the previous, the fifth local Prince Starodub, from 1330 to 1354 or next year. In the chronicles is mentioned only once, namely at the death that followed, according to this direction, in the 1354 "Velvet Book", for some unknown reasons and grounds dating his death in 1364, which is, apparently, a mistake, Nevertheless, repeated later by some drafters of pedigrees, including ". ?. Spiridov. Buried in the DF Starodub. He had an only son, Seeds Dmitrievich epithet Nettle (8). 6. Ivan, the second son of Fyodor Ivanovich (4), brother of the preceding, the sixth local Prince Starodub. After the death of Dmitri (in 1354) family inheritance without any dispute should go immediately to I.F., as the oldest in kind. However, to rule, he sat down just at the end of 1356 due to it in all probability, so that JF could only exercise their right to inheritance, when it was followed by resolution of the khan, and, indeed, one chronicler said, in the end 1355 JF went to the Horde, have every reason to think that this trip was entirely due to worries about the IF statement of his successor on hereditary table. Of the Horde with the award, he returned in winter 1356, when, and begins his reign (that date is contrary to the simple MG Spiridov: based on errors of the death of Dmitri, – according to him, in 1364 – he trying to maintain a continuous chronological succession of the princes, the beginning of the reign itself, IF true, of course, also in 1304, yet in reality, JF had already been deprived of his inheritance – see below). The name of this prince related decline independence Starodubsky inheritance, and along with it and its rulers. JF was one of those rebellious princes, who strongly opposed the apparent desire of Moscow to absorb all the inheritance, and their princes turn into obedient henchmen, temporarily leaving behind only a shadow of independent rulers. In JF was still alive the traditions of independence and freedom of action, to fight for them and for specific interests, he paid the price. In 1359, 13 November, died led. book. Zvenigorod and Moscow Ioannovich John II (mild), and the grand throne should go to his nine-year old son Dimitri (later – Don) was the rival of the last Prince of Suzdal, Dmitry Konstantinovich III. In kindled between the two rivals fight JF took the side of Dmitry Konstantinovich, as, indeed, and the vast majority of princes, who were either directly for the book. Suzdal or sympathizers. Lining these sympathies clear. Specific princes, driven by Moscow in Dmitry not without reason, assumed to meet a man who, having attained a princely throne, will not infringe on their autonomy and independence, a pledge which were to serve some of the very nature of Dmitri, and partly by a sense of gratitude to his supporters. First, fate smiled at Prince of Suzdal and all who stood at his side: from 1359 to 1363 he was a great prince who lived in Vladimir but the end result of the struggle, as is known, ended in victory Dmitry loannovich and he – or rather, behind him young boy on his boyars – taking advantage of a favorable opportunity, to take decisive measures against the princes, who sympathized with his opponent. JF, along with the book. Galicia (Dmitri Ivanovich), was with one of the first victims of the afflicted places in Moscow. In 1363 (probably at the end) he was deprived of his inheritance and banished from Starodub, and then went to Nizhny Novgorod to Andrei Konstantinovich, who became Prince of office. The subsequent fate of IF is not known. He is considered childless all pedigrees, except such Golovin, who, witho
ut specifying a reason, gives him a son and grandson of Dmitry Basil. 7. Andrei Fedorovich, third and youngest son of Fyodor Ivanovich (4), the seventh prince Starodubsky inheritance, which came to him in 1363 after the expulsion of his brother, Ivan's (6). In contrast to the latter?. FA was completely won over Moscow, but otherwise could not be, because he inherited a lot and, of course, not without the consent of the Prince of Moscow. Indeed, all a few details, report chronicles suggest that he not only tried to resist Moscow, but on the contrary, very often helped her cope with its adversaries. Among many other princes he walked, for example, with Dmitry Ioannovich in 1375, to Tver to Prince Michael (Matthew) Alexandrovich, and in 1380 participated in Kulikova battle, any restraint on the right wing of the Russian troops. MG Spiridov who, in compiling their family trees, used by some sources, burnt at the Moscow fire of 1812, said that the AF was involved in other campaigns of Dmitry Donskoy, and even famous for his bravery and skill in war. Despite this, the dependence of its resistivity as the prince of Moscow, went so far that its parishes were ruled from Moscow, and the governors. He reigned in Starodub, seems to 1380 as likely and died about 50 years old, – the date of his birth is estimated to 1330?. F.only one of three sons of Fyodor Ivanovich (4) is the successor of the genus (the average of them died childless, and older offspring, Dmitri, stopped at his son, Simon – see 8). He had four sons: Basil (9) – Prince. Pozharsky, Theodore (10) – the successor dynasty, actually Starodub, Ivan (11) – nicknamed Nagavitsa-Ryapolovsky and David (12) – nicknamed the club. AF first of its kind began to break up the ancestral inheritance into smaller parts. Even during his lifetime he outlined his eldest son, Basil, a particular parish, Pohar, with the death of the same AF each of his sons received a total area of the inheritance of individual fiefdoms than Starodubsky principality, which is already not very big and strong, and crumbled further weakened with the passage of time and the growth of offspring basic kind of turned into a number of small and tiny townships. However, the children and further descendants?. F., owning separate fiefdoms, received usually on behalf of the most recent settlement respective nicknames and became the founders of the new princely families. However, not all future members of the genus, were possessed of a common inheritance, necessarily acquired new nicknames, some of them continued to remain known as princes of Starodub, although the main inheritance never were; this surname withheld by tradition, should recognize that such princes only conditionally, without the specific epithet. On the other hand, the princes Starodub called and some descendants of AF, it is not owning any township. In the same way as previous clause applies to them. Therefore, even the name of all their princes Starodub and narrow sense of the word correctly, the more correct name of their feudal lords of the same name that mistakenly allowed almost all genealogical books. Note also that if on the first record of the genus, and provide some, albeit very brief news, then on the later of which chronicles the attention is almost completely absent, only pedigrees contain some of them more than laconic instructions. In general, the subsequent princes, evolved from the basic kinds of Starodub, with a gradual degeneration of principalities and a parallel increase in power in Moscow, some earlier and some later, completely deprived of its independence and became or simple the local owners, patrimonial, or the servants of the Moscow State. 8. Semen Dmitrievich, nicknamed Nettles, the only son Dmitri (5), neudelny book. Starodub. Spiridov mistakenly calls him by his patronymic Fedorovich and finds no son, and brother, Dmitri. After the death of his father he had not received any of the main table, as the latter moved to a senior in the family, uncles, SD, – first, to Ivan, and later to Andrey Fedorovich – not a separate parish, for at that time Starodub inheritance principle is maintained indivisibility. All the news about a few chronicles SD converge on the fact that in 1368, the invasion led. book. Lithuanian Olgerd to Moscow, he was killed by soldiers of the latter in one of the "stretch" (fighting) in the cavity Holhne (also Holohne and Holohle, in the present province of Kaluga), which probably was the chief outpost. Children SD had, and with his death the elder line died out kind. 9. Vasily Andreyevich, Prince Pozharsky, the eldest son of Andrei Fedorovich (7) – the first of Representatives Starodub, received during the life of his father in the main with a particular parish (Pohar, on behalf of which formed the nickname), and the first that gave rise to a new genus – Prince Pozharsky. About himself and his son Daniel and grandson of Theodore, from the great-grandson of the fifth son of which his famous Prince Dmitry Pozharsky – see Pozharskie. 10. Theodore A., second son of Andrei Fedorovich (7), eighth feudal prince Starodub, hereditary inheritance received about 1380 and owned them, in all probability, before the end of the first quarter of the XV century. Why he was Vice father at the main table, and not his elder brother (see previous), remains unclear. We can only assume, or that Vasily Andreyevich time the death of his father was no longer alive, or that he has a separate lot, quite satisfied with them. Information about the life of FA has not been preserved almost none. Under him in 1410 (presumably, that this time he was alive), Tatars on their way back from the wrecked and looted by Vladimir casually took Starodub.The territory of the principality vladeemogo much has been cut parts that have fallen into the inheritance of his brothers, after his death, it is even more fragmented among his children. FA had five sons: Theodore (13) inherited by his father, Ivan (14), nicknamed Morhinya, even Ivan (15), the founder of the princes Golibesovskih, Peter (16) and Basil (17), which gave rise to the genus princes Romodanovsky. However, FA is the successor dynasty, actually Starodub, as the offspring of his brothers bore other names and nicknames. 11. Ivan Andreevich, nicknamed Nagavitsa-Ryapolovsky third son, Andrei Fedorovich (7), the ancestor of the princes Ryapolovskih. His nickname he received from Ryapolovskogo camp (in the current Suzdal district), the main settlement in the parish, given him an inheritance. For more information about IA itself, about his children Ivan, Simon, nicknamed Khripun, Dmitri and Andrei, called the Loban, then on the grandson of the eldest son, Simon, and three grandchildren (the eldest and two younger) from his second son, Theodore, Greater Peter, and Basil (called Mnich) Semenovich – see princes Ryapolovskie, grandson of the same Fedor Less epithet Striga, the father of princes Strigino – see Strigino, finally, about his great-grandchildren, children Fedor Semenovich more. Ivan, called the Hillock and Ivan, nicknamed thief – see, respectively, and the princes Khilkov Tatevs. 12. David A., nicknamed Epigonation, fourth and youngest son of Andrei Fedorovich (7), the ancestor of the princes Palitskih fire Paletskiy (assimilated name) is only known pedigrees. He had four sons. On the eldest of them, Theodore Davidovich colorful, founder of the princes of the same name – see v. "Paul – Peter, St. Petersburg. , 1902, p. 617, where his father was wrongly named Theodore, and not David Andreyevich. The second son – Alexander Davidovich, in pedigrees is Paletskiy, but it seems wrong, there is reason to believe that an individual nicknames he had, why it should be attributed to neudelnym princes Starodub, died childless, and probably in the late fifteenth century. On the third son of David A. – Dmitri, nicknamed sheepskin – see Tulupova princes, and the fourth – Ivan, extinct Paletskiy, as well as his children – Theodore More, Basil, John and Theodore Less I. – see book. Paletskiy (ie, "Paul – Peter"), and finally, the children Fedor Motley, Ivan, and two of Andrew's, More and Less
, the founder of three lines of princes Gundurovyh – see these princes. 13. Fyodor, the eldest son of Theodore A. (10), ninth prince Starodubsky inheritance, which is inherited from his father's death around the end of the first quarter of the XV century. No information about him has survived, he is known only from the pedigrees. He had seven sons: Vladimir (18), Ivan (19), Constantine (20), Andrew (21), Peter (22) Seeds (23) and even Ivan (24). On average five of them, respectively, there have been generations of princes Krivoborskih, Lyalovskih, carpet, and Osipovspih Neuchkinyh. Time of death of FF only very roughly can be attributed to the 40 th year of the XV century. 14. Ivan Large, nicknamed Morhinya, the second son of Fyodor Andreyevich (10), neudelny book. Starodub, at the main table, or sat, had a separate parish (which is – not known), but held a generic name. From the pedigree is known only that he left no children. 15. Ivan smaller nicknamed personally Lapa and township Golibesovskim the third son of Fyodor Andreyevich (10), founder of the book. Golibesovskih. Known only to pedigrees, had two sons: the youngest of them, Vasily Ivanovich, nicknamed Holytsia, went princes Nebogatov; senior, Mikhail Ivanovich, in turn, had three sons: Basil, George and Ivan, the first two of which were successors to the genus and third, nicknamed loon, gave rise to numerous old Princes Gagarin, the existing and the present. 16. Peter F., fourth son of Theodore A. (10), neudelny book. Starodub and died, probably as a child, why him and preserve the main name. 17. Vasily Fedorovich, fifth and youngest son, Theodore A. (1910), nicknamed Romodanovsky, which was crucial to its inheritance settlement Romodanovki, the ancestor of the princes Romodanovsky, faded in 1730 about him personally no information has survived.About the children as his: a) the courtiers Basil (Ambassador to the Khan of Crimea and Lithuania, the commander in the campaigns in Seversk, against the Swedes, to Atlanta, Lithuania, Livonia, etc.), b) nobleman, Ivan (the governor in many campaigns, mostly against Tatars, and the second governor of the Moscow-thirds), c) Danya (party campaigns against the Lithuanians and liflyandtsev), d) Yuri (commander in the campaigns against Novgorod), e) Fedor (Ambassador to the Crimean khan) and e) Boris (participant in a campaign to Novgorod and at the Battle River. Krapivke 1504) – see the princes Romodanovsky. 18. , Vladimir Fedorovich, eldest son of Fyodor Fyodorovich (13), the tenth and last book ratio. Starodub, ancestral inheritance received after the death of his father, near the end of the 40-ies, and held it for ten years. The name?. AF is associated complete loss of independence Starodubsky inheritance, which in the mid XV century. finally was absorbed by Moscow and brought down to the level of ordinary province. ?. AF was childless, and with his death extinguished race itself Starodubye princes. All the uncles and brothers VF, except for Ivan (1924), who has died before him, – gave rise to the prince's leave the other items. This exhausts all the information about?. F. 19. Ivan, is it bigger or smaller, in contrast to the brother of the same name (24), which is often confused, probably the first epithet, and depending on that IF should be considered as the second son of Fedor Fedorovich (13), it as the seventh brother, and not vice versa, as some mistakenly pedigrees; by parish, he had received an inheritance from his father, he became known as Prince Krivoborskim and gave it a name and their descendants, who soon lost all independence and already in the XVI century. occur in the service of Muscovy, in the military and administrative positions. Sam JF known only from the pedigrees. Of the four sons, J. F. Senior, Alexander, was voevoda John III, in 1492 – 1500, he participated in various campaigns including Novgorod, is shown in the nobility and the second – Fedor, nicknamed Laycoe, and Lusk, and a third – Simon, nicknamed Tarzan – referred governors in the same tours, and finally, the fourth, Ivan – he served in the late XV century. boyar in Novgorod archbishop. The son of Alexander, Ivan, was the first commander in the campaigns of youth Terrible (1544 – 1550 years.), And his children: Andrew – is mentioned in the campaign in 1544, Basil Big – the governor of Astrakhan in 1576 – 1577 years. Ivan – was in the bell Fedor – the governor, first in Grozny, and then with Theodora and Godunov Finally, Vasily smaller – with the governor in 1576, in 1583, was killed. Rhode these princes existed before 1600 20. Konstantin, called bilge, the third son of Fyodor Fyodorovich (13), the ancestor of the princes Lyalovskih, soon faded. About him no other information. Only his son, Ivan, in 1495 he was sent to Vilna for daughters of Tsar Ivan III, of the grandchildren did not know, Boris is great-grandchildren and Vasily Ivanovich in 1514 participated in the Battle of Orsk, where they were captured in Lithuania, and there died without leaving descendants. 21. Andrei Fedorovich, on a personal nicknamed Carpet, fourth son of Fyodor Fyodorovich (13), the ancestor of the princes of carpet – see t. "Knapp – Kiichelbecker", St. Petersburg. , 1903, p. 31. 22. Peter Fedorovich, the fifth son of Fedor Fedorovich (13), the ancestor of the princes Osipovsky, soon ceased, and his son Ivan, nicknamed the blind, is shown in the children gentry, in 1495, he was in the Novgorod campaign, and in 1502 – the governor in a campaign to Lithuania . 23. Semen Fedorovich, nicknamed White Guzitsa, sixth son of Fedor Fedorovich (13), the ancestor of the princes Neuchkinyh. He and his son Ivan and vpuk Andrew, which kind of broke, known only to pedigrees. 24. Ivan, nicknamed sheep, seventh or the second (see 19), son of Fedor Fedorovich (13), Prince of Starodub neudelny; know of him only that he was a monk in the Trinity-Sergius Monastery (Lavra later). Literature about the kind of princes Starodubye general: Handwritten "Bloodline": in the Archives of the Ministry of Foreign. Affairs in Moscow – № № 84 – 110 (4 °, ch. 22), 174 – 280 (F °, ch. 23), 187 – 296 (Pedigree book of the great knyazeh from Augustus Caesar's Rome and the great great knyazeh Russia Muscovy and the specific princes, 4 °), 222 – 383 ("Genealogy", 4 °), 592 – 1094 ("Podoslovets Russian grand dukes and princes … Russian"), in Moscow. Society Russian History and Antiquities. – № № 177, 178 and 179 (4 °, ch. 24), in Imperial. Public Library – Q, IV, № № 47, 102, 272; there, in the dep. drevnehranilischa MP Pogodin – № № 1518 ("Stairway great. sovereigns and great.Russian princes ") and 1604; in the library of the Empire. Academy of Sciences – № № 29 (4 °), 31 (4 °) and 37 (F °). -" Genealogy of the book in the three lists, synodical and two others, "published. "Times. Empire. Phys. commonly. history. and ancient. Russian. "Kn. X, M., 1851 – Kn. Dolgorukov P.," Russian rodosl. book ", that is?, St. Petersburg., 1854, p. 237 – 238, 250: v. II, St. Petersburg., 1855, p. 49, 294. – Kn. Lobanov-Rostovsky," Russian pedigree. Book, 2 v. – P. Petrov, "For a few, special notes on genealogy, history., Archaeological. and the Arts ", St. Petersburg., 1871. – It is," The History of the Russian nobility of labor, so I, of St. Petersburg., 1885, p. 56, 57, 63 – 69, 84, 95, 109 – 137. – "Genealogy of the book of princes and nobles of Russian and leaving" ("Velvet Book"), Part II, Moscow 1787, p. 58 – 59, 381, 383 – 381, 413. – MG Spiridov, "Short description of official business honorably. Russian nobles, M. 1810. – T. Malghin, "Parable of Russian tsars," ed. third, St. Petersburg. 1791, p. 234 ff. – Golovin, "Genealogy of the descendants of great painting. book. Rurik, M., 1851 – "Genealogy of the book and the great princes kind Rurik", in "Notes on Russian istopii, Part V, St. Petersburg., 1793 – J. Jeanty," Pedigree of the kings and princes, Russian … with the accession of the chronological tables, Tiflis,
1888 – P. Stroyev, "On the genealogy of ruling the Russian princes." "Son of the Fatherland", 1844, Part XIV and "Life and works of P. Stroyev." – L . Meaton, "Pedigree. ruling. Russian. princes of the paintings NM Karamzin, "St. Petersburg., 1821 – (attributed to Catherine II)" Rodoslovnik princes great. and specific kinds of Rurik, St. Petersburg., 1793. – VI Shilov, "Pedigrees table" in "key, or alphabetic. Index to History of Russia Solovyov. "- P. Havsky," The Family trees of the progeny carried. book. Rurik "," Severn. Bee ", 1835, № 135. – Ermerin," Overview of births occurred on the lead. book. Rurik. "-" Pedigree Starodub and Pozharskys princes, extracts from the synodic "," Moskvityanin, 1852, Vol XIX. – "Pedigree Starodubska. and Pozharskys "," World Illustrations. "- Gr. Bobrinskii," Russian deliveries made to the General Armorial. "-" General Armorial. "-" Alphabetical reference. List of Russian princes and members of tsarstvuyusch. Romanov Dynasty ", St. Petersburg., 1871 – V. Durassov," Genealogy book all-Russian nobility, Part I, St. Petersburg., 1906, Dep. I, Sec. II. – I. Golyshev "earthly resting place of . DM Pozhars'kogo, Vlad., 1885 (rodoslovn. table Starodubye). – S. Smirnov, "Biography book. DM Pozhars'kogo ", M., 1852 (rodosl. table).. – FP Minyushinsky," The kind of book. Pozharskys "," Proceedings of the Ryazan learned. arch. Commis. "v. X, no. I, Ryaz., 1895 (rodosl. table).. – Barsukov," Review of sources and literature. Russian genealogy. "-" Complete Collection of Russian letopicey ", vols. of I, II, IV, V, VI, VII, VIII, XV. -" Nikon. years old. "ed. Acad. Science, Vols. II, III, IV. -,, Lavrentyev. annals." above. Archeograf, Commissions., St. Petersburg. , 1872 – "Meeting of States. Charters and treaties, Volume I, St. Petersburg. , 1813. – "Acts of the Moscow State. – "Acts arheogr. Expedition", I, SPb, 1836 – "The discharge book (" Symbirs'kyi collection "), Moscow, 1845. – "Acts of history.", Etc. I, St. Petersburg. , 1841, page 268 (about Starodub), Volume III, page 183 (about Starod.-Ryapolovskom that one and the same). – S. Christmas, "the serving tenure and the Moscow State", SPb. 1897 (under the index, the Prince's estates. Starodubye). – A. Ekzemplyarsky, "Great and specific princes of Northern Russia in a Tatar from 1238 to 1505 years.", II, St. Petersburg. , 1891, p. 174 – 200. – H. Karamzin, History of the Russian State ", Vols. III, IV, V. – Soloviev, "History of Russia from ancient, times, etc. III, IV. – V. Tatishchev, "History of Russia since ancient times", so ІIІ. – D. Ilovaisky, "History of Russia, am the second, M., 1880. The principal directions of the department, are representative of the genus; numbers correspond to those of the same in the text: 1) Vol. Sobre. Russian translation. Years., V. I, p. 174, 177, 181, 190. 191, 199, 200, 201, 225, v. II, p. 152, 326, 338, v. IV, c. 33, v. VII, pp. 106, 113, 117 – 119, 133, 143, 144, 152. – Nikon. years., Vol II, pp. 316 Volume III, pp. 3, 4, 19. – Lawrence. years., v. I, pp. 191. – Risen., Vol II, pp. 156. – Velvet. kn., am I, pp. 16, Part II, pp. 58. – P. Petrov, I, pp. 137 – 138 – Pushkinskaya. years., under the 1226 – Tatishchev, Vol III, pp. 472 – 473. – Karamzin, v. III, etc. 122, 153, 154, 350, 369; Vol. VI, pp. 5, Ave 1, 114, 152, 247, 308, 376, v. V, etc. 14. – Ekzemplyarsky, Vol II, pp. 176 – 179. – 2) PS RL, VII, pp. 175. – Nikon., III, pp. 60, 109. – Barh.book., II, pp. 58. – Petrov, 138. – Karamzin, IV, 82, etc. 152, 247, 308, – Soloviev, Volume III, rodosl. Table. – Ekzemplyarsky, II, 179 – 180. – 3) Nikon., III, 109. – Velvet. book. II, 58. – Karamzin, IV, ca. 247, 308; V, c. 33. – Petrov, 137. – Ekzemplyarsky, II, 180. – 4) Nikon., III, 155. – Karamzin, IV, pp. 143, etc. 308. – Soloviev, III, etc. 524. – Petrov, 137. – Barh. book., Part II, 58. – Ekzempyarsky, II, 180. – 5) PS, RL, I, 231, VIII, 9, 16; XV, 429. – Nikon., III, 205; IV; 21. – Karamzin, IV, pp. 174, etc. 376. – Ekzempl., II, 181. – 6) PS?. L., II, 350; IV, 64; V, 229, VIII, 10. – Nikon., III, 207; IV, 5. – Karamz., IV, pp. 282, 376, etc., v. V, pp. 2. – Ekzempl., II, 181 – 182. – 7) PS RL, IV, 70; V, 233; VIII, 22. – Nikonov., IV, 42 – 44. – Karamz., V, pp. 21, 39. Ave 33, 288 – Ekzempl., II, 182 – 183. – PS RL. I, 231; VIII, 16; XV, 429. – Nikon., IV, 21. – Barh. book., Part II, 58. – Karamz., V, pp. 9. pr 14. – Ekzempl., II, 181. – 9) Karamz., XII, etc. 335. – Velvet Prince., Part II, 58. – Ekzempl., P.183, 188 – 189, 190, – Petrov, 133. – Kobeko, "On the development of genealogich. Data", St. Petersburg. , 1887. – K. Tikhonravov, "The news of the kind of book. Pozharskys", "Vlad. Lips. Vedas.", 1855, № 39. – Pedigree chart in the book of Malinowski, "Biografich. Information about the book. D. M. Pozharsky", M., 1817, v. I. – F. ". Minyushsky, "The kind of book. Pozharskys", "Proceedings of Ryazan. Scholar. Arch. Comite.", X, at. 1, Ryaz., 1895 – "Moskvityanin, 1852, Vol XIX; 1855, № 4. – "The World. Illustrations.", 1872, VII, № 169. – 10) Tver years., L. 485. – Ekzempl., II, 183 – 187. – Petrov, 138. – Barh. book., II, 59. – 1911) P. CP L., VI, 173 – 176; VIII, 107, 147. – Nikon. years., V, 206, 285. – Arhang. years. under 1440 – Collected Works. Gos. Gr. and Dog., st, № 160. – Karamz., V, etc. 224, 367. – Acts arheogr. Clin., I, 339. – Ekzempl., II, 198 – 199. – Petrov, 200 – 201. – Genealogy book. Khilkov "," World. Illustrations "., 1878, Vol XX, № 500. – YI Ludmer, "Rodosl. Kn. Khilkov" on dep. sheet of "Courland. Lips. Vedas.", 1895, № 3. – A. Khilkov, "The core of the Russian Empire, Moscow, 1770 – On the sort of book. Tatev, "Russian. Entz. Words." Berezin, sv – "List of Prince. Tatevs" in "historical. Describing the Trinity-Sergius Lavra. – 12) N. Saveliev, Rostislavich, "Kn. Paletskiy" Military Enz. Vocabulary., X., sv – Lob.-Rostov, ed. 1-e, st, sv – Enz. words. Brockhaus, v. 22, sv – Bulatov, "Materials for the genealogy and history of the yard. Deliveries of Rostov. At." (About the book. Gundurovyh). – 13) Petrov, 142. – Ekzempl., II, 187. – 14) Ekzempl.,? I, 198. – 15)? Golibesovskih, Entsikl. Lex., sv – Barh. book., II, 59. – About the Gagarin: Genealogy, "The World. Illustrations.", 1870, III, № 69. – Russian. Enz. words. Berezina, Entsikl. Lex., Enz. ff. Brokg, sv – P. Dolgorukov, "Russian. Rodosl. Team.", Part 3. – His own, "Rodosl. Book, Part I apply. – Lists of titles. Leave, "ed. e-ta herald SPb. , 1892. – M. Cherniavsky, "Genealogy of the nobility, made in the pedigree. Book Tver Province." Tver, 1869, – RJ Annuaire, "De la Noblesse de Russie …", am I and II. – 16) Pedigrees Petrova, Velvet. kn., V. Durasova et al – 17) were collected. Gos. gram. and dogs., st, № 531. – Ekzempl., II, 198-199. – AN Saveliev, Rostislavich, Prince Romodanovsky "," Voen.-entsikl. Lex. ", Sv – Likhachev," Discharge deacons "(by decree.). – H. Dolgorukov, "Rodosl. Book, Part II. – RJ Ermerin, "Annuaire ..,", am I. – Art. Kleinschmidt, "Russland's Geschichte und Politik dargestellt in der Geschichte des russischen hohen Adels". – 18) Ekzempl., II, 188. – 19). M. G. Spiridov, "Short description of official business …", Part II, pp. 56, 57 and ff. – Petrov, pp. 142. – Karamzin, VII, 201, etc.; X, etc. 435. – Ancient. Ros. Vivliof., XIV, 235. – Ekzempl., II, 196. – Entsikl. words. Brockhaus, v. 16, sv – 20) Barh. book., II, 61 – 62. – Ekzempl., II, 196. – 21) B. Tutorsky, "Hist. Notes and stories about Kovrov", "Vlad. Lips. Vedas.", 1857, № 47. – Ekzempl., II, 196 – 197. – I. Tokmakov, "City Carp
et and Carpet princes; materials for their pedigrees, Vlad., 1886. – "Spiritual willing. Kn. Iv. Sem. Kovrova, Vlad. Lips. Vedas., 1840, № in 1949. – Enz. words. Brokg, v. 15, sv – 22) Barh. book., II, 63. – Ekzempl., 197. – 23) Petrov, 137. – Barh. kn., ІI, 64. – Ekzempl., II, 198. N. Serbs.